The Stained History of "The Church":
Why I Do Parachurch
Acts 1:10-11
And while they were gazing into heaven as he went [ascended], behold, two men [angels] stood by them in white robes, and said, "Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven."
I would love to believe that we who love God, confess His Son Jesus, and obey His word, will be taken up into the clouds in a pre-tribulation rapture of the church. Nothing would make me happier. I have no tradition scheme to adhere too, no religion that holds me to a special distinction. But at the same time, I do not follow that "the church age" should be seen as the millennial kingdom. I don't see scripture teaching that we should lean amillennial, seeing the millennium symbolically as the current church age where Christ reigns spiritually. Certainly the Holy Spirit is indeed at work in every Christian faith community to one degree or another, not locked down by the traffickers of traditions. But the believe that these last two thousand years has been the millennial age where Christ reigns is to ignore the satanic elements that clearly exist in every one of those faith communities. Something that cannot be possible based upon the prophecy.
I believe the bible should be taken seriously and that Christ’s return is real and visible. The divide I see is over what "literal" means in prophetic contexts and whether early Church tradition helps guard against misreading symbolic elements as future literal events.
I think we Christians could argue these things until the cows come home, nevermind Jesus returning. But what I see as critical and meaningful in our faith traditions is not what track we follow, but what we're doing while we're tracking.
Are we ready to serve the gospel, or are we readying ourselves to serve our organization.
I guess you could say that I am leaning on faithfulness in the present, not getting lost in speculative timelines or institutional defenses. the millennial age can’t plausibly be the last 2,000 years if we take Revelation 20 seriously, which I do. And if that's where I stress my thinking, then the argument is over because everything contrary to that thinking is going to be born out of someone's ideas, someone's speculation.
The text is clear, during the millennial age Satan is bound so he "might not deceive the nations any longer" (Rev. 20:3).
Take a look around.
Is that our current reality?
If you believe so you're downright crazy. In fact "The Church" is itself poisoned by satanic ideologies. Communism, progressivism, capitalism, totalitarianism, and many other human inventions are infecting the church today like medieval mildew. Today, deception is rampant, not restrained. The text doesn’t describe a partial or progressive binding; it portrays a decisive, sealed imprisonment in the abyss that halts his ability to mislead nations on a grand scale until the period ends and he’s released briefly (Rev. 20:7-9). If Satan were truly bound from deceiving the nations during this era, we’d expect a far different landscape; one where gospel light floods unchecked, deception is minimal, and righteousness dominates globally.
We see NONE of that.
Instead, evil thrives, even in professing Christian spaces.
Call me blackpilled, but I'm a realist believer. I wake up, I pray to my God in thanksgiving for another day of grace. I pray for myself and the world, I pray because we ARE NOT living in the millennial age in which Christ reigns over the affairs of men.
I refuse to pretend that rituals, robes, funny hats and hairdo, art and architecture, relics and traditions, and more, can stand against the schemes of Satan. I refuse to pretend that the current state of the world matches a bound-Satan, deception-free millennium. That’s not defeatism; it’s refusing to spiritualize away the plain gravity of what Scripture describes and what we see every day.
Revelation 20:3 is unambiguous on the purpose: Satan is thrown into the abyss, shut and sealed "so that he might not deceive the nations any longer" until the thousand years end. I see no reason to take that prophecy any other way than literally.
Why?
Because there is no cogent argument to take it any other way.
There is no qualifiers suggesting partial, progressive, or limited restraint. If the purpose is to halt the deception of the nations on a grand scale, and we observe no such halt (deception flourishes globally, ideologies twist truth, false teachings spread even in churches), then a literal future fulfillment fits the text without forcing it into a symbolic mold to match current conditions. End of story.
So...go ahead, call me a dispensationalist. Relegate me to the tribe of that teaching.
I understand the amillennialist views; Satan's binding is not a blanket inability to act, Revelation is filled with symbolism, Jesus already "bound the strong man" to plunder his goods (Matthew 12:29), and problems with premillennial sequences. I've resolved most of that in my own mind by adopting a Midtrib attitude.
I could absolutely change my thinking on these things. All that needs to happen is "The Church" needs to show how Satan is restrained in their historical context. Show me the wars that didn't come as a result of the "Holy Wars". Show me how the church's history isn't stained by the blood of corrupt decisions, decadence, racism, wickedness, sloth, lukewarmness, strife and division founded on politics and greed. If I didn't know better I'd say Satan is reigning in the church.
I suppose you could try and argue that it's just mixed reality of the present age, those are the works of the disobedient. And I wouldn't disagree with that. But if "The Church" has disarmed Satan, then humanity is worse than even that fallen angel. Humanity is more inventive in its wickedness, more persistent in their rebellion. Especially when cloaked in religious garb, that suggests something even darker. And I suppose maybe that's true. Maybe we shouldn't hope for a golden age. Maybe we should be blackpilled.
But honestly, I can't.
I live for the hope of the gospel. I want to be a fisher of men. I work to share Christ's forgiveness, not slavery to a tradition.
Crusades baptized in blood, slavery defended from pulpits, modern scandals wrapped up in "grace" or "justice" rhetoric, greed dressed as stewardship; you can have those institutionalized things and call it the tradition of the fathers, or sacred church heritage, but I call it Satanic.
When "Christian" structures produce fruit that looks more like the kingdom of darkness than light, it’s fair to call it corruption from the adversary, not just human failure. And that informs my mind, telling me that the tradition is marred by false teachings, the heritage is poisoned by false promises, a form of godliness that denies its power.
This is why I track the path of parachurch gospel centered fruit bearing. The hope of the gospel isn’t a cleaned-up version of corrupt traditions, it’s new birth. It's about saving souls, not upholding traditions. I'm about sidesteping the heavy machinery of denominational politics, entrenched hierarchies, and tradition-for-tradition’s-sake that ALWAYS ends up stifling the Spirit’s work. I lean into the priesthood of all believers, empowering ordinary disciples.
This doesn’t mean parachurch is perfect; most groups drift into their own forms of "mildew" (celebrity leaders, donor-driven agendas, self-centeted people or diluted messages laced with politics). But that's the way it goes in a world where Satan isn't restrained and humanity is even worse than him. We just focus on the gospel, advocating for Christ and finding his lost children.
Not alone, we come "alongside" (para-) the local church without replacing it; focusing on specific calls like evangelism, discipleship, and mercy. The work the 1st century church did, in my case, reaching the incarcerated, while empowering ordinary believers to step up. We're not bound by institutional red tape or historical baggage; we’re simply fishing for men, offering new birth through Christ’s forgiveness, and watching souls get saved. That’s the hope of the gospel in action; transformative, personal, and unencumbered by corrupt legacies.
That’s the real tradition worth upholding; the one from Christ alone.
Amen.