Let All God’s Angels Worship Him
Hebrews 1:6
And again, when he brings the firstborn into the world, he says,
"Let all God's angels worship him."
This Septuagint version is essentially where God calls Jesus God.
In Psalm 97:7 (Psalm 96:7 in the Septuagint):
"Worship him, all his angels" (or "all you gods" in the Hebrew MT, which the Septuagint renders as angels).
Why is this important?
In Hebrews 1, the author is making a series of arguments showing the superiority of the Son (Jesus) over angels.
Why is it necessary that angels be shown their proper order?
The early Jewish/Christian audience of Hebrews held angels in very high regard (possibly bordering on veneration). If the early Christians began to view Jesus as merely another (even if exalted) angelic being or a highly exalted creature (created not begotten), then the entire Christian faith would collapse. The temptation was that some would begin to view Christianity as just another version of Judaism. So, the author is fighting a drift toward inferiority, in which Jesus is portrayed as a great prophet or angelic mediator rather than the divine Son.
The author is not primarily correcting the angels themselves (they already know their place). He is correcting human thinking about the proper order of reality.
Here's why it matters.
If Jesus is just the highest angel, then He is still a creature. But if He is the eternal Son who shares the divine nature, then worshiping Him is not idolatry. And therefore, if the Son is indeed superior to the mediators of the old system, then the New Covenant He mediates is vastly superior. This is why Hebrews 2:1-4 immediately warns, "How shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation?"
You cannot preach the gospel, preach Jesus as the Messiah, and not preach salvation through Him alone. By grace through faith in His resurrection.
For every sincere Christian this is a non-negotiable link.
The superiority of the Son = superior mediation → superior covenant → superior salvation. You cannot separate them.
You cannot faithfully preach the Gospel while downplaying or denying the full deity of Christ. Salvation is through Him alone (Acts 4:12; John 14:6). It is received by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9). It is grounded in His death and resurrection (Romans 10:9; 1 Corinthians 15:1-4).
The scriptures make this VERY clear.
If Jesus were merely a creature; even a perfect, sinless, powerful one, he could not bear the infinite weight of God’s wrath against sin, nor could He serve as the perfect high priest who always lives to intercede (Hebrews 7:25). Only the divine Son can do that.
We cannot do it.
Saints cannot do it.
Angels cannot do it.
Apostles and super-apostles cannot do it.
Only the Son of God has this power and authority. Only One is worthy.
We are restricted by our flesh. Our righteousness is as filthy rags (Isaiah 64:6). These body's we have are limited by our world. We are comprised of very little good. Even the saints are just fellow servants, earthly beings who point us to the Lamb (Revelation 19:10, 22:9).
Therefore, only the eternal Son has both the nature and the authority to accomplish our redemption. He alone can bear the infinite weight of God’s holy wrath because He is Himself the infinite God (Colossians 2:9; Isaiah 9:6). God said it. He alone can offer a perfect, once-for-all sacrifice because He is sinless by nature, not merely by choice (Hebrews 7:26-27). He alone can serve as our eternal High Priest because He "always lives to make intercession" (Hebrews 7:25). For death could not hold the Author of Life.
This is why the worthiness declaration in heaven is so powerful.
"Worthy is the Lamb who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing!" (Revelation 5:12)
There is no competition. The One who is worthy is the same as the One who is seated on the throne. The slain Lamb who is also the Lion of the tribe of Judah.
The Son is superior in every way, the salvation He brings is infinitely superior. To diminish the full deity of the Son is to diminish the Gospel. A lesser Christ produces a lesser salvation, which amounts to no salvation at all.
This all seems clear, doesn't it?
Then why the need to clear it up?
Because many in the early days of the church (and even now) were attempting to disconnect the obvious Trinitarian nature being expressed here. Some wanted to protect strict Jewish monotheism by subordinating the Son. Others, influenced by Greek philosophy, found it easier to see Jesus as a kind of demi-god. The early church faced Judaizing tendencies on one side and pagan philosophical pressures on the other. Many in that age quoted certain verses (like "the Father is greater than I" in John 14:28) while downplaying the stronger deity texts. And today these very same verses are used in the same way by some.
These people today want what those then wanted, to portray Jesus as some sort of super-angel (Unitarians, Jehovah witnesses, Mormonism, etc). And so, the need to make sense of all these things. The early councils and the creeds were established as guardrails, not innovations. They summarized what the church had already known and had been confessing in its worship, baptism, and martyrdom. These "confessions" expressed in profession the Trinitarian nature already expressed in Scripture. The One God eternally existing in three Persons, with the Son fully sharing the divine essence.
It’s the faith "once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3).
And the early church understood these things because of the apostles teachings and scripture. Christians then prayed to Christ, sang to Christ, and baptized in the name of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. All because scripture informed them about these things. The early church did not develop these practices in a vacuum or invent them centuries later. They flowed directly from the apostolic teaching and the Scriptures they had received. These practices were not later additions. They appear in the New Testament itself. Directly given by the disciples or disciples of disciples of the apostles.
So, when errors like Arianism arose, the councils simply clarified and defended what was already believed, confessed, and practiced. They were not creating new doctrine but protecting the apostolic deposit. They didn't invent the Bible or the practices of the church delivered to them by the apostles, they were laying it down for the church to profess and protect. They clarified, defended, and formally confessed what the apostles had already delivered through Scripture and what the churches had already been living out in their liturgy for generations.
The councils simply drew a clear line in the sand. This is what Scripture requires. This is what we have always believed. Anything that reduces the Son to a creature (even a "super-angel" ) foreign to our faith. They did this so that false teachers could be identified. So that new believers could be instructed, especially those who were coming out of the other traditions. These confessions were never meant to stand above Scripture. They were summaries of Scripture, tested against Scripture, and serving Scripture.
End of story.