Dynamic Faith on Moriah: Whole-Life Surrender and the God Who Raises the Dead
Hebrews 11:17-19
"By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and the one who had received the promises was offering up his only son; it was he to whom it was said, "Through Isaac your descendants shall be named." He considered that God is able to raise people even from the dead, from which he also received him back as a type."
In obedience, and through absolute faith in the word of God, Abraham knew God would fulfill His promises through his only [through Sarah] son Isaac. On the third day, after going to Mount Mariah with his son Isaac, he built an altar to sacrifice his only son as God commanded.
"Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love…and offer him as a burnt offering" (Genesis 22:2)
Abraham clung to the promise even as he walked toward the hardest thing God had ever asked of him. Isaac was not just a beloved son; he was the only son of the covenant; the child born through Sarah according to God’s miraculous promise. After three long days of travel (a journey that itself carries resurrection echoes), Abraham lifted his eyes and saw the place God had shown him. And he told the servants who had traveled with them, "Stay here…I and the boy will go over there and worship and come again to you."
Abraham framed the entire journey as worship. And he spoke with full confidence that both of them would return. It was resurrection faith in action. So even as he carried the fire and the knife, and Isaac carried the wood, Abraham was preparing to worship on that mountain.
That's total costly obedience to God's word. Total surrender to his faith. And remarkably, that is exactly what happened. They did worship. God provided the ram. Isaac was spared. Father and son came down the mountain together.
This is the kind of faith that obeys when it hurts, trusts when it doesn’t make sense, and worships even on the mountain of sacrifice. Abraham didn’t start with easy belief. He had years of walking with God, seeing promises, waiting, and wrestling. Yet when the ultimate test came, his faith held because it had been forged over time through surrender and obedience.
In the beginning for me, I wasn't seeking, wasn't interested, and had no felt need for God or any faith community. Then the sovereign hand of God broke in. He changed your mind, provided what I lacked in faith, and transformed my heart.
Beginning with a nighttime surrender to prayer.
The words...
"I no longer want to be You"
This was my Mount Moriah moment.
It wasn’t shallow or convenient. It was costly, real, and life-altering. And like Abraham, once I committed to His word, God faithfully provided teachers, voices, and daily bread to strengthen me.
In an interesting twist, God provided a controversial revelation that helped me intellectually grow in understanding the dynamics of faith. From the very beginning, at the advent of the internet age, I have been involved in countless conversations with strangers about faith. Through those early years of chat rooms and online web based connections, I was exposed to many different views on religion. I found myself in countless conversations with strangers from all backgrounds. Some helpful, some challenging, some outright hostile. Through that unlikely furnace, the Lord sharpened my thinking, stripped away superficial ideas, and anchored me more deeply in the truth of Scripture.
But the most interesting start to this whole journey was a debate that occurred about progressive ideologies and theological principles. I of course have always held to a conservative view, but ironically at the time I was an ordained deacon in the congressional church. That faith community was part of the very Liberal UCC. I learned about the depths of that perverse ideology from within that synod. Their studies were deeply infected by Spong and Borg.
And many online battles were fought over these liberation movements, progressive re-interpretations of the faith.
In one such battle, a sincere and friendly group. I was challenged to read Paul Tillich...
That recommendation became a controversial but pivotal revelation the Lord used to help me intellectually grasp the dynamics of faith. I went into this challenge, thinking that I was going to dispute the things that Paul Tillich was writing about because I really knew nothing at all about him. But what I discovered was some amazing intellectual thought. His writings became a powerful part of my "before and after." And it demonstrated for me that absolute faith eventually requires us to stand on a secure understanding of Scripture alone, even when it costs relationships or community.
Many among the progressive Liberal branches of Christianity cherry-picked Tillich's existential, philosophical, and often abstract views. But somehow; and I never understood how, they managed to support their re-imaginings of Christianity using his name, and they frequently bypassed the robust Protestant depth in his Systematic Theology that he intellectually pulled together. One of my favorite works by him is, The Dynamics of Faith.
As was my habit in those days, I read everything he ever wrote (every available sermon as well) and watched many videos he produced. I wanted to understand what he was truly driving at. And I never saw a progressive liberal in any of his teaching.
And so it's really sort of comical that the Lord brought me to this greater understanding through some progressive liberal debater who thought they pulled a fast one on me. I can credit my fuller understanding of the word of God and about matters of faith to that silly liberal person.
I don't know what they were reading, but Tillich explores faith not as mere belief or emotional comfort, but as ultimate concern. The centered act of the whole person, involving risk, doubt, and commitment. For me in those early days of study among the progressives, it seems that the Lord used Tillich’s framework to intellectually clarify what absolute faith actually looks like. Not some fragile assent, but a dynamic, whole-life surrender that holds even when challenged. And he backed up these with the works of other great Christian minds.
God led me to consume voraciously the works of Bonhoeffer, C.S. Lewis, J.I. Packer, A.W. Tozer, William Booth, John Wesley, Charles Finney, and many more. What began as an attempted "gotcha" from a progressive debater became one of the stepping stones the Lord used to anchor me more deeply in the truth of Scripture and the reality of costly, obedient faith.
In the context of today's scripture discovery, I see Tillich's words at work. Abraham’s faith on Moriah was exactly this kind of dynamic, whole-life surrender. It involved risk (the knife), doubt (how can the promise survive?), and total commitment (“We will worship and come again”). It wasn’t fragile. It held under pressure because it was rooted in the character and power of God.
Notice.
It wasn't faith in an institution or program. Abraham wasn’t trusting in a religious system, a temple, a set of rituals, or even the visible covenant community. He wasn’t leaning on what the servants thought, or what others in his household might have advised. His faith was personal, direct, and rooted in the character and promises of God Himself.
This mirrors deeply with Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s teachings, especially in The Cost of Discipleship. Bonhoeffer relentlessly contrasted cheap grace (grace without obedience, faith without surrender, religion without the cross) with costly grace; the kind that demands everything, that calls us to true discipleship, and requires personal, obedient surrender to Christ.
Likewise, Tozer’s writings (especially The Pursuit of God and The Knowledge of the Holy) hammer on the same core reality. He constantly warned against "the religion of the crowd," external forms, and a Christianity that is all doctrine or activity but lacks the actual presence and knowledge of God.
Tozer repeatedly called believers to move beyond "theology on the surface" into a whole-life surrender and intimate communion with God.
"The man who has God for his treasure has all things in One. The man who has everything except God has nothing." — Tozer
Abraham proved he had God as his treasure. The knife proved it. His words to the servants proved it.
May we be that kind of people.
C.S. Lewis, in his warnings against "Christianity-and-water," reinforced that faith must be robust and personal; not a comfortable cultural appendage.
J.I. Packer, stressed that knowing God personally (not just knowing about Him) leads to obedience, trust, and worship even in the dark.
William Booth embodied active, costly obedience. His "blood and fire" passion showed faith as total-life commitment; reaching the lost, caring for the poor, and refusing to settle for comfortable religion.
Charles Finney called for an "entire sanctification" and revival through personal consecration reinforcing the "no turning back" nature of Abraham’s obedience.
And John Wesley taught on the warmed heart, scriptural holiness, and "faith working by love" adding to the relational, transformative fire. He showed that true faith is both deeply personal and outwardly obedient. Exactly what Abraham displayed when he rose early and walked with Isaac toward worship.
All these voices, and many others, (even some who never wrote a book), formed a powerful chorus the Lord used to move me from the intellectual stirring of Tillich into a robust, Scripture-saturated, whole-life faith.
Side Note:
One lesson to learn from this is how two people can read the same book and discern vastly different ideas from it. The same Tillich who fueled progressive re-interpretations in liberal circles became, in the Lord’s hands, a tool that helped clarify dynamic, biblical faith for me.
This reminds us that human authors, (even gifted ones) are not the final authority. Only the Holy Spirit illuminating Scripture can give us true understanding. The progressives took Tillich in a Liberation theology direction, mingled with politics. The Lord used him to point me toward a more robust, Scripture-saturated surrender. That difference is not ultimately about one's intelligence or reading comprehension. It’s about the heart’s posture before God. It's about our intent.
All I can say about that is, you'd better have a sincere intent when you claim to speak for God's intent. Don't take His name in vain for political purposes or cultural reasons. Don't drag the world into your exploration and exposition. Claiming to speak for God’s intent while dragging in worldly politics, cultural agendas, or personal biases is a very serious eternal matter. It violates the very heart of what we see in Abraham; a sincere, undivided posture before God. No mixture, no manipulation, just humble obedience and worship. Abraham didn’t try to negotiate with God, reinterpret the command to fit his preferences, or soften it for cultural acceptance. He simply trusted and obeyed with a sincere heart. The same standard applies to all of us who teach, preach, or even converse about the faith.
Amen 🙏🏼