Who Do We Serve? Jesus’ Truth and the Battle for Our Motives
John 8:58
Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am."
There are those who say, "Jesus never claimed to be God", and yet Jesus himself is making his case for being the Son of God, and he goes so far as to say, "I came from God and I am here. I came not of my own accord, but he sent me." (vs. 42) And the Jews interpreted these spiritual things in those terms. No one was confused about what he was arguing. Oh sure, they were confused about quite a lot, after all the Devil was blinding them to many things, but no one involved in this conversation was unclear on what Jesus meant to say. The Jews couldn't see beyond the materialistic meaning of Jesus' words, but they weren't growing angry and seeking to kill him because he didn't claim to be God's Son. And just in case we the readers can't understand why the Jews thought the way they did, Jesus explains the situation for us...
John 8:43
"Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word."
This whole conversation is about their personal desires. It's not that they can't see God's Son standing before them, it's that they don't want to see him for who he really is.
Now why wouldn't they want to see God's Son?
Think about the Parable of the Tenants. A landowner plants a vineyard, leases it to tenants, and sends servants to collect his share of the produce. The tenants beat, stone, and kill the servants. Finally, the landowner sends his son, thinking they will respect him, but the tenants kill the son, hoping to seize the inheritance. Jesus asks what the landowner will do, and the listeners reply that he will punish the tenants and give the vineyard to others. The landowner represents God, the vineyard is Israel (or God’s kingdom), the tenants are the religious leaders, the servants are the prophets, and the son is Jesus. It illustrates the rejection of God’s messengers and Jesus by the leaders, predicting their judgment and the transfer of God’s favor to others (often interpreted as the Gentiles or the Church).
Why didn't the wicked tenants respect the landowner's servants and Son? The tenants wanted to seize the vineyard for themselves obviously (Matthew 21:38).
Recognizing the son as the heir, they saw him as a threat to their control. Killing him was their attempt to eliminate the rightful heir and claim the inheritance, reflecting a refusal to submit to the landowner’s authority. In the allegorical sense, the religious leaders resisted Jesus’ authority because it challenged their power and exposed their hypocrisy. The tenants likely have been profiting from the vineyard and didn’t want to share the produce or relinquish control. This parallels how some religious leaders benefited from their positions and saw Jesus’ teachings as a threat to their status and wealth. Their repeated violence against the servants suggests a progressive hardening of their hearts. By the time the son arrives, their moral corruption is complete, making them incapable of respect or repentance. This reflects the spiritual state of those who persistently reject God’s messengers.
In John chapter 8 Jesus attributes these actions to the Devil's lies. He tells them directly that Satan has enslaved them to his lies and sin. In the allegory, he points this out in their predisposition and failure to anticipate divine judgment for rejecting the Messiah. They are predisposed to violence against the landowner. Nowhere in the story do they ever reflect sincerity or a genuine devotion for the landowner.
And Jesus comments on that in John 8:44-45.
"You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. But because I tell the truth, you do not believe me."
So, Jesus is directly commenting on their character and their motives. The religious leaders (Pharisees and others) see Jesus as a threat to their authority. His claim, "Before Abraham was, I am" (John 8:58), directly invokes the divine name ("I AM," echoing Exodus 3:14), asserting his divinity and preexistence. This challenges their religious and social dominance. Accepting Jesus as God’s Son would mean surrendering their power, prestige, and control over the people, which they were unwilling to do. In John 8:43, Jesus says, “You cannot bear to hear my word,” indicating a spiritual inability to accept truth due to their entrenched rejection of God’s messengers. This aligns with the parable’s depiction of the tenants’ consistent rebellion. In John 8, their anger escalates as Jesus challenges their spiritual lineage, saying they are not true children of Abraham (John 8:39-40) but of the Devil. The Devil, as the "father of lies," has shaped their worldview, making them predisposed to reject truth. And we see this same murderous, deceptive spirit reflected in the scheming of the tenants as they plot to kill the son to maintain their illusion of control.
I can't help but think, "weren't they concerned about judgment and punishment for their actions?"
Their failure to anticipate divine judgment reflects their spiritual arrogance and reliance on their own self-righteousness (John 8:33, claiming freedom as Abraham’s descendants), which Jesus dismantles. The parable predicts the consequences, judgment and the transfer of God’s favor, while John 8 shows this rejection in real-time, culminating in their attempt to stone Jesus.
This challenges us today to examine our own hearts:
Are we open to Jesus’ truth, or do we resist when it threatens our control, comfort, or desires? What molds or guides our interpretation of Jesus' words? Whose glory are we seeking when we search the scripture? When we devote ourselves to our religion, what are we hoping will come of it?
I think the right answer to these questions MUST be that we want the Holy Spirit to work in and through us. To guide believers into all truth. This is what Jesus promises in John 16:13. I think in a perfect world a right motive would be to have a heart open to the Holy Spirit, allowing us to interpret Jesus’ words in alignment with God’s will, free from personal bias.
This promise assures us that the Spirit:
• Illuminates Jesus’ words, helping us understand and apply them (John 8:31-32). And John does say that some do believe Jesus.
• Frees us from personal bias, cultural distortions, or the Devil’s lies (John 8:44). In John it is said that the Devils "native language" is lies. The Holy Spirit changes our native language.
• Aligns our desires with God’s will, producing fruit for His glory (John 15:8).
But are we in a perfect world? Is our religion "for His glory"?
What would it look like in a perfect world?
In the context of the Parable of the Tenants, a heart open to the Spirit would have led the tenants to respect the landowner’s servants and son, recognizing their authority. Similarly, in John 8, the religious leaders could have embraced Jesus’ claim, "Before Abraham was, I am" (John 8:58), if they had been receptive to God’s truth rather than hardened by pride and deception.
This is why the disciples of Christ approach Jesus’ words prayerfully, asking the Spirit to reveal truth and guard against our native self-centered lenses. We desire God’s glory, not our own, trusting the Spirit to shape our motives. And we hope for transformation, freedom from our sin nature, and a life that bears fruit for God’s kingdom, empowered by the Spirit.
We should regularly ask the Holy Spirit to soften our hearts, to reveal truth, and expose our biases. Before reading scripture, we should pray, "Spirit of truth, guide me into all truth, and guard my heart from selfish motives."
We must humbly acknowledge our imperfections and confess when our motives stray toward self-glory or comfort. We must allow scripture to challenge our desires, as it did the religious leaders. And we should engage with other believers who can help us to discern the Spirit’s voice and call out our blind spots.
The religious leaders’ isolation in their pride (John 8:44 "You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires..." ) contrasts with the early church’s communal pursuit of truth (Acts 2:42 "They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer." ). In a perfect world "the church" would be only about these Acts 2 things. No church politics. No social justification of cultural biases. No political ideology or agendas. No greed or pride, just teaching of the scriptures, fellowship of the believers, communion in remembrance of Christ's sacrifice, and prayer.
Oh, how I long for such a church.
It didn't last long following Acts 2. The church quickly got involved in many culture clashes and downright apostate systems of religion. It's what people do; we aren't living in a perfect world. And much of the New Testament was written to deal with this situation. And John's gospel, being the latest gospel scripture to have been written, tries to pull it all together on the backside of that struggle to hold firm and faithfully to the truth. That struggle is ours and it must continue, because the Devil never rests.