Read Revelation chapters 2 and 3
"To the angel of the church in Ephesus...I have this against you, that you have left your first love."
"to the angel of the church in Smyrna...you will be tested, and you will have tribulation"
"to the angel of the church in Pergamum...I have a few things against you, because you have somethere who hold the teaching of Balaam"
"to the angel of the church in Thyatira...you tolerate the woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, and she teaches and leads My bond-servants astray so that they commit sexual immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols"
"To the angel of the church in Sardis...you have a name that you are alive, and yet you are dead"
"to the angel of the church in Philadelphia...Because you have kept My word of perseverance, I also will keep you from the hour of the testing, that hour which is about to come upon the whole world, to test those who live on the earth."
"To the angel of the church in Laodicea...because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will vomit you out of My mouth. Because you say, 'I am rich, and have become wealthy, and have no need of anything,' and you do not know that you are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked"
Is serving a faithful journey?
Is orthodoxy a faithful journey?
Is loving one another a faithful journey?
Is form and function a faithful journey?
Is correcting error and keeping sound doctrine a faithful journey?
Is having all the fortunes and resources, popularity, and prestige a faithful journey?
So many questions about how we "do church".
Take for instance Ephesus, they were doing the labor. They were enduring. They were testing error and refusing evil. The machinery of ministry kept running. But what they had abandoned was the love that once produced the works, the so called "first love".
What is that first love?
First love is the original affection for Christ Himself. A glad, and personal attachment that makes the work overflow rather than the work becoming the main thing. But when that love cools, the same fellowship can continue as faithful activity while the heart has already left.
The same ministry can be done with a living heart or with a cooled one. Ephesus kept the works, the toil, the endurance, and the testing of error. What they left was the heart that once made those things the overflow of love for Christ rather than the main thing itself. All form and function but no inner beauty.
These seven letters to the churches do not treat any single activity as the whole faithful journey. They treat Christ Himself as the measure, then show what happens when a church keeps one good thing and lets go of another.
Orthodoxy is not by itself the faithful journey. Ephesus tested false apostles and hated the Nicolaitans. Pergamum held fast His name even where Satan’s throne was, yet tolerated the teaching of Balaam. Thyatira had love and service and faith and endurance, yet tolerated Jezebel. Sound doctrine is required; it is not sufficient. Discernment without love becomes harsh. Love without discernment becomes compromise. Neither is the whole.
Loving one another is not by itself the faithful journey. First love includes love for the brothers and for the lost, but it begins as affection for Christ. When that cools, as we see so often in our modern age, "loving one another" can become sentiment, program, or worse, the tolerance of what He hates.
Look at Sardis, they had the Name, the machinery, the reputation, the appearance of life remained. Yet, Jesus said they were dead. The church that measures itself by its tolerance of the worldly cultures has already left the One who walks among the lampstands. They have the fortunes, resources, and popularity of the world, yet they do not know they are wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked.
So what is the faithful journey?
It is the heart attached to Christ so that the rest follows in its proper place. Not replaced by activism, devotion to idols, caught up in fornication and strange affections.
If you're looking for the one journey that receives no rebuke, look to Philadelphia.
They had little power. They kept His word and did not deny His name. And Christ Jesus promises to keep them. That is closer to the shape of a faithful journey than any list of activities or any claim of riches. The churches that kept something good and lost Him, or kept Him and still tolerated what He hates, are the warning. The call in every letter is the same in substance; hear what the Spirit says, hold fast to the Son, repent where the heart or the teaching has drifted, and then overcome those things. Take them seriously. Don't ignore the drift. The one who does is promised the tree of life, the crown of life, the hidden manna, authority, white garments, a pillar in the temple, and a seat with Him on His throne.
Where We Are Now
Largely among Christian people, Roman Catholics, Orthodox, Protestant, Independent, we see them in the letter to Thyatira and Sardis. Thyatira as the church that still has works of love and service yet makes room for a teaching that leads Christ’s servants into idolatry and immorality, and Sardis as the church that has the reputation of life while most of what bears the name is dead. But I believe there is a better explanation.
The safer reading is that Thyatira and Sardis are conditions of faithfulness and failure, not a single denominational address. These conditions appear widely now, and they appear inside every Christian stream to one degree or another. The main charge against every stream is tolerance. Tolerating Jezebel, pagan practices, sexual immorality, religious freedom taken to the extreme in many idols. These traits or "adaptations" are the works of both the orthodoxy and the reformation. Both have failed to preserve in fending off these stumbling blocks fully.
"Tolerance" is the right word for Thyatira, and it is part of Pergamum as well. Jesus does not condemn Thyatira for lacking love or service. He condemns them because they tolerate a teacher who claims the Spirit and leads His bond-servants into sexual immorality and idol-food. That is not "religious freedom." That is a church making room, inside the household of faith, for a word that Christ hates. Civic liberty to worship is not the issue in these letters. Syncretism is.
Syncretism = An amalgamation, an attempt to sync up with many traditions, many ways to God's grace. To mix up the words and thoughts.
Its root is somewhat understood as, everything under the sun is Cretanus (synkretismos), Cretans known for setting quarrels aside to stand together. laying private quarrels down to face a common enemy. Ecumenical, common ground.
But syncretism is not civic religious liberty. God's word leaves no room for that. No tolerance for it, ironically. Syncretism is the attempt, inside the church, to sync Christ’s name with other ways, other tables, other beds, and still call it grace. Balaam taught Israel to mix worship and immorality with Moab. Jezebel does the same under a prophetic title. Pergamum and Thyatira are charged with making room for that mix, not with allowing the neighbor to live next door.
Plainly speaking, it is taking what God has separated and forcing it into one fellowship. It's the church’s temptation and attempt to baptize the tolerance and call the mixture wisdom.
So here's the thing. What I've witnessed. Brothers from different faith streams can merge their labor together in the gospel, advocating for Christ's way, without mixing tables or beds or "many ways to grace." But you'll also witness the streams carrying "drift" wood. Remnants of the things Christ has separated out. They'll come into the house of worship or mission fields in subtle ways. Through sermons and discussions. At the feasts and celebrations. In the backbiting and gossips. The creeping crud of tolerance and compromise disguised by Christian language.
The charge is not that the churches never served or never taught. It is that they tolerate, inside the household of faith, a word that leads Christ’s servants into sexual immorality and idolatry. Syncretism puts another table and another bed inside the church and still calls it grace. The danger is the remnant that still comes in wearing Christian speech. The weeds. And Christ COMMANDED US to leave them among the wheat. Maybe to test our faithfulness. Do not appoint yourself the final uprooter of every false person in the world, but at the same time, do not make room inside the church for a word that denies His sovereignty, mixes His table, and leads His servants into idolatry and immorality.
So folks, church, hear what the Spirit says. Hold fast to the Son. That means you advocate for Him alone. You preach Christ the redemption and the resurrection. Tolerating nothing else that denies His sovereignty.
Repent where the heart or the teaching has drifted.
Do not ignore the driftwood.
Overcome.
Amen?