Remember the Poor: The Gospel’s Answer to Tribalism
Galatians 2:21
"I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness [justification] were through the law, then Christ died for no purpose."
Paul is driving home that justification (being declared righteous before God) comes solely through faith in Christ’s finished work on the cross, not by observing the Mosaic Law. And any attempt to add law-keeping as a requirement for salvation undermines God’s grace and renders Christ’s death unnecessary or pointless. That's clear, there's no denying what Paul claims here. But more importantly than that, this isn’t just theology, it’s the heart of the gospel Paul defended fiercely.
These early chapters of his letter to the Galatians reveals the real-world tensions in the early church. He's recalling his interactions with the Jerusalem apostles (like Peter, James, and John, who "seemed to be pillars" in the church) to affirm unity in the gospel. Yet, there wasn’t always immediate consensus; debates raged over how Jewish identity and practices fit into this new reality of faith in Jesus. These were Jews afterall, and it's not like they stopped being Jews after the ascendancy of Jesus Christ.
The core flashpoint for debate was the role of Jewish markers; especially circumcision, dietary laws, and table fellowship for Gentile believers. Who was in, who was out, who were the bastard stepchildren. And how should the church deal with these tensions. The Judaizers (Jewish Christians who insisted Gentiles must adopt Jewish customs to be fully part of God’s people) pressured the church, creating division. Paul recounts confronting Peter (Cephas) in Antioch precisely because Peter, out of fear of these "circumcision party" influencers from Jerusalem, withdrew from eating with Gentiles. This hypocrisy sent a mixed message. It implied Gentiles were second-class unless they lived "like Jews." Paul called it out publicly because it wasn’t "in step with the truth of the gospel" (Galatians 2:14).
These early struggles mirror our divisions today in the church, and in society at large. Debates over cultural identity, traditions, legalism vs. grace, and how faith intersects with heritage. It's all coming from the spirit of tribalism, boiled down to inclusion and belonging in the family of God.
Who gets to sit at the table?
Who has "a right" to sit!
Who is fully "in" without needing to adopt someone else’s cultural or ritual markers to prove their legitimacy?
NONE of that nonsense has anything at all to do with the Gospel. It's just the same spirit that never left the room from back when Jesus walked among them. The spirit that caused them to argue among themselves about who will be the greatest among them. The spirit that prompted ideas about sitting in places of honor next to Jesus. It’s the persistent echo of that ancient, fleshly spirit Jesus confronted head-on among His own disciples.
Remember the scene in Mark 9:33–37 (and parallels in Matthew 18, Luke 9)?
The disciples argue on the road about who among them is the greatest. Right after Jesus predicts His death and resurrection, the ultimate act of self-emptying, they’re squabbling over hierarchy, honor, and positioning. Here we are several books into the New Testament and you'd think the apostles would be over these worldly ideas. But no, nothing of the sort. How easily they all seem to have forgotten, that the table isn’t reserved for the "qualified" or the "culturally aligned"; it’s set by grace for sinners who come empty-handed. And it MUST remain so. For good reason.
Friends, remember what Jesus told them, it was timely then and remains true today:
"If anyone would be first, he must be last of all and servant of all"
Then He brings a child into the circle, someone with zero status, no credentials, no power, and says welcoming such a one welcomes Him and the Father who sent Him. Christian culture isn’t about climbing ladders; it’s about descending into service, humility, and a childlike dependence.
Why does this spirit persist so stubbornly?
It never left the room because it’s the default human operating system apart from the cross. The Judaizers in were operating from the same playbook; "We’re Jews by nature, not sinners from among the Gentiles" (implied in Galatians 2:15), so add our markers or stay second-class. And today, the same tribalism, often more entrenched and visible than ever, even as it wears fresh disguises. Endless fractures and debates over non-essentials elevated to gospel-level stakes. Denominational silos where one group claims the "pure" path. Debates over cultural or ethnic markers creeping into fellowship. Subtle legalism that turns grace into performance; rigid stances on music, dress, vaccines, voting patterns, or even how one interprets end-times prophecy as a boundary for fellowship.
Tribalism, is just competition over cooperation, mistrust over mission, self-preservation over kingdom advancement. It didn't vanish at conversion; it persists still as part of what Scripture calls the flesh; that lingering residue of the old self, hostile to God and prone to self-exaltation.
Why didn't God remove the spirit of tribalism?
Biblically, the reason is clear and unflinching. Even after we’re united to Christ, the flesh remains in us until glorification. Paul describes this vividly in Romans 7 as an ongoing inner war. The cross crucifies the old self positionally, breaking sin’s dominion and power to condemn us, but the remnants of corruption linger, waging a personal guerrilla warfare against the Spirit in every believer. The flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh, so we don’t always do what we want (Paul gets into this later in Galatians chapter five).
This is why believers still battle pride, fear, comparison, and the urge to elevate their particular group as superior. For the Judaizers, adding markers wasn’t about protecting the gospel, it was about maintaining status, control, and an in-group edge. Today, the disguises have changed, but the spirit is identical. Tiers of belonging, the illusion that "we" are more legitimate, more holy, more "in" with Jesus.
From a human perspective, psychology offers insight into why this feels so instinctive and hard to shake. Humanity developed in small, competitive groups where strong in-group loyalty boosted survival; sharing resources, defending against threats, cooperating for hunting or child-rearing. Out-group suspicion was adaptive; favoritism toward "us" triggers automatic biases like ingroup favoritism and confirmation bias. This "groupish" wiring provides security, reduces uncertainty, and satisfies deep needs for identity and belonging. Tribalism feels good because it taps into ancient survival instincts, even when it poisons cooperation and mission.
But here’s the gospel difference; the Scriptures don't leave us stuck in our fatalism. The flesh persists, yes, but it’s no longer our master. We’re called to walk by the Spirit, renew our mind, put to death the deeds of the body, and consider ourselves dead to sin. The cross doesn’t just forgive; it empowers this radically unhuman transformation.
This persistent tribalism spirit reminds us we’re not yet home, but it also should drive us to the cross daily with open tables not guarded seats. With everyone serving as servants washing the feet of the others, serving and loving one another. No insulation needed to preserve the "norms". Instead a barrier shattering grace.
Scripture refuses to let us resign to "that’s just human nature." The flesh, our default operating system, persists even in believers. But it’s no longer sovereign. The cross crucifies it positionally. They tried to influence Paul, intimidate him. They tried to force his hand in regard to Titus. Tried to make him part of the "in" crowd by circumcising the Gentile out of him. Titus served as a living test case for the gospel’s freedom. It was classic tribal gatekeeping; "Join us fully, or stay second-class." The same playbook as the disciples' greatness debates. And the same tests exist today; denominational/political/cultural litmus tests. But Paul saw through it; the cross had already crucified such hierarchies, and he saw through their motives :
Galatians 2:10
"Only they asked us to remember the poor, the very thing I was eager to do"
It was about preserving hierarchy, enforcing conformity, keeping the "in" crowd exclusive, and of course promoted fund-raising. And Paul refused to blink. His discernment flips tribalism on its head; no guarded seats for the "qualified," but open-handed service to the overlooked.
Friends, the Apostle Paul is saying:
"Don’t add to the gospel, live it out by loving the least."
And always remember, agape love is unconditional. It asks nothing in return. It doesn’t bargain, doesn’t demand reciprocity, doesn’t attach strings, because it’s rooted in God’s own character. Agape love doesn’t guard the table; it sets more places, washes more feet.
May you stand firm, as Paul did, refusing to add one jot or tittle to the gospel; no matter the pressure, the intimidation, or the tribal pull. Go in that grace. The table is open, the seats are unguarded, and the least are welcome. In Christ's Holy name, amen.