The Ripple Effect: When a Contradictory Baptism "Teaches" the Church
Luke 5:31-32
"It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance."
Today I want to comment on a recent viral video making the rounds (Lily Phillips rebaptism). But before I do please allow me to lay the spiritual groundwork.
From a scriptural standpoint, the Bible emphasizes that no one is beyond God’s reach, regardless of their background. Jesus Himself associated with tax collectors, prostitutes, and sinners. And he taught that this isn’t a dismissal of the self-righteous (like the Pharisees who criticized Him for eating with tax collectors and sinners); it’s an invitation into repentance.
Jesus deliberately sought out those whose lives were marked by obvious sin, brokenness, or societal rejection, because they were often more aware of their need for mercy than those who prided themselves on outward righteousness. And these people experience a great love for God because they have received great mercy.
The key crucial phrase in Luke 5:31-32 is "sinners to repentance". Jesus doesn’t call sinners to a mere association with Him, or to a superficial label of "Christian," but to [metanoia] a profound turning, a change of mind and direction that results in forsaking sin and following Him. Repentance isn’t optional; it’s the doorway to the forgiveness and new life He offers.
As Jesus told the woman caught in adultery in John 8:11, "Neither do I condemn you; go, and from now on sin no more." But today there is a level of indifference to this command. There's a certain unfaithfulness in our church cultures today centered around the need to have people profess faith in Jesus Christ. And as a result there are churches filled with believers who are unbaptized, unrepentant, and unfaithful to the teachings on professions of faith.
Here's the hard but wonderful truth, Jesus' gospel of repentance is a divine invitation out of sin through repentance. The phrase "sinners to repentance" is decisive. Jesus’ entire ministry begins with the same summons:
Matthew 4:17
"Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand".
And even John the Baptist prepared the way with the identical message.
Peter’s first sermon at Pentecost culminates in:
Acts 2:38
"Repent and be baptized…for the forgiveness of your sins".
And the apostle Paul summarizes his preaching as testifying...
Acts 20:21
"to both Jews and Gentiles of repentance toward God and of faith in our Lord Jesus Christ"
Repentance and faith are two sides of the same coin; you cannot have saving faith without repentance, and genuine repentance always issues in faith. Modern ears often hear only the faith half and treat the repentance as optional or a subjective judgmental condition. This view trivializes faithfulness, even eliminates or renders it unnecessary.
Friends, true conversion isn’t a one-time ritual or declaration, it’s evidenced by ongoing fruit (Galatians 5:19-23 vs. the acts of the flesh). As a child, while I was an infant, my parents had me "Christened" baptized in a sense through sprinkling. Of course I didn't repent, or profess faith in Jesus Christ at that time. Later on as a young man I did repent and profess faith in the context of rote religious ceremony. No real confession of my alienation from God. No real confession of my sins, in fact I couldn't have even explained what my sins were at that time. So I couldn't have left my sin behind when I reaffirmed my infant baptism.
As an adult I did repent, and convert to Christ. I did confess my known and unknown sins and I completely understood those sins for what they were. And I reaffirmed my baptism into faith.
I thought at the time that I should have been "rebaptized" and talked with my pastor at the time about that. And together we dove into a deep spiritual journey into understanding what faith, faithfulness, righteousness, repentance, and love for God is truly about. And it wasn't a spell, or charm that a believer employs to complete that journey. My cross that I wore wasn't a talisman, and my Bible wasn't a literal sword that I carried. And so, I was very publically reaffirmed in my believers baptism and commissioned into faithfulness.
It became clear that the practices surrounding baptism are often treated like a shamanistic tradition. And though the person can be immersed into the water, the spiritual union has nothing at all to do with that water or the depths one goes or doesn't go.
Immersion into Christ is spiritual. Dead to sin and alive to Christ is spiritual. Crucified to Christ is not literally death on a cross. Buried in Him is faithfulness in Him. Salvation is placing a person in union with Jesus Christ.
The Believers Baptism
Romans 6:3-4
"Or don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life."
Galatians 2:6
"know that a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith [but through the faithfulness of…justified on the basis of the faithfulness of] in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law, because by the works of the law no one will be justified."
Colossians 2:8, 11-12
"See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces [the basic principles] of this world rather than on Christ."
"In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead."
This is what Peter calls "the baptism that saves".
So what is the relationship with immersion baptism and salvation?
It's important for those who are professing faith and repenting of and confessing of sins. Baptism is a public testimony of believing in the forgiveness of Jesus Christ. It’s a public speaking of that faith.
Salvation does not depend on the water or its depths. Again, it's not a charm or incantation. Baptism produces nothing but the blessings of obedience. Salvation is by repentant faith alone. True baptism is spiritual immersion into Christ. This is the one baptism of Ephesians 4:5 that actually saves.
Peter calls "the baptism that now saves you" (1 Peter 3:21) is not the removal of dirt from the body, not the physical act, not the water, not the mode, but the appeal to God for a good conscience through the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Whether sprinkling, pouring, or immersion, the water itself has no saving power. Treating any particular mode as necessary for validity slips into the very "human tradition" and "elemental spiritual forces" Paul warns against in Colossians 2:8. True conversion isn’t a one-time ritual or declaration, it’s evidenced by ongoing fruit
All this said to get around to the timely viral video moments making the rounds in this age. For instance, as of today, Lily Phillips’ (famed Only Fans model) rebaptism, which took place on December 28, 2025, continues to dominate the online discussions. And you'll read everything from condemnation and absolute outrage to exhortations against the Christians who question her motives.
As for Lily, she described the baptism event as a personal "reinstatement" of her relationship with God. And she has repeatedly stated that her explicit adult online content has "taken a back seat" as she prioritizes faith and other ventures in 2026. And she expressed belief that even an OnlyFans creator can pursue Christianity alongside progressive views (supporting same-sex marriage and abortion rights). Meanwhile, Her X account has posted NSFW (not safe for work, adult content) material as recently as this week, with no visible changes to her bio or content strategy. And of course this has fueled widespread skepticism, with many viewing it as inconsistent with biblical repentance.
This highlights the inseparable link between repentance and faith.
John the Baptist preached:
Matthew 3:8
"Bear fruit in keeping with repentance."
The apostle Paul preached that people...
Acts 26:20
"should repent and turn to God, performing deeds in keeping with their repentance."
Jesus welcomed sinners, but always with the call to...
John 8:11
"sin no more"
Yet what we see today is this trend like in Phillips’ case illustrating the modern danger of a "faith" that accommodates unrepentant sin, treating grace as a license rather than liberating power.
I'm not concerned about her apparent unrepentant behavior. Frankly that's between her and God. If she truly is trying to use her adult rebaptism as a means for reinstating her connection to God, then the reality is that her faith is already "all wet".
Baptism...whether infant christening, youthful reaffirmation, or adult immersion...is never a magical reset button.
The water does not wash away sin in some shamanistic sense; only the blood of Christ does that, applied through repentant faith. If the outward rite is performed without the inward reality of turning from sin and trusting Christ, the participant emerges just as they went in; wet on the outside, unchanged on the inside.
So why the exhortation fuss?
When someone undergoes a public baptism while openly persisting in the very lifestyle that Scripture calls sexual immorality (to put it mildly), it risks profaning the symbolic nature of baptism, trivializing it, or worse in my view, promoting the shamanistic notions surrounding that practice.
Baptism is not a neutral photo-op or personal wellness ritual. It is a sacred, public declaration. It is a kind of enacted gospel sermon on Christ’s death and resurrection portrayed before the world, being lived out in that public testimony. And so, when that symbol is enacted while the life loudly contradicts it, where explicit adult content continued unabated immediately after, it reduces a holy ordinance to a viral moment or emotional catharsis, detached from repentance and faith. And this "teaches" many in the church to do likewise. It creates a ripple effect that instructs the watching world, and especially the watching church, in a false gospel.
Remember church, "even permissible things become sinful if they cause others to stumble" (1 Corinthians 10:23–24).
This visible contradiction, amplified across social media, silently teaches several destructive lessons to impressionable believers and seekers:
1. Baptism is a personal therapeutic moment.
2. Grace accommodates ongoing sin.
3. Repentance is optional or gradual in a way that never requires forsaking clear sin.
4. Public profession matters more than private transformation.
The result?
A generation of Christians who view baptism as a box to check rather than a grave to enter. Christian people who view holiness as legalism and ongoing immorality as "struggle" to be affirmed rather than confronted. A church teaching to announce faith publicly while living unchanged privately, because they have seen it modeled without correction.
This is why faithful shepherds and discerning believers cannot remain silent. We do not pronounce final judgment on anyone’s heart. We pray earnestly that God would grant true repentance and fruit that endures. But we must guard the symbol, lest the church learn from viral contradictions what it should only learn from Scripture.
I see this modern trend as just another form of the same spirit we saw many years ago (primarily in 2006–2007) when it was a viral phenomenon to post videos (The Blasphemy Challenge) professing unbelief in the works of The Holy Spirit. Where people would openly blaspheme the Spirit in order to make themselves cursed by the unforgivable sin. Thousands responded, posting videos with phrases like "I deny the Holy Spirit" to "prove" they feared no eternal consequences, mocking Christianity and reveling in what they thought was irreversible damnation. It was raw defiance; a public, performative rejection of God, designed to shock, gain attention, and signal rebellion against biblical truth.
Fast-forward to today, and we see what feels like the inverted mirror image in cases like Lily Phillips’ rebaptism. Here, the performance isn’t open blasphemy but a highly viral "return" to faith. Meanwhile, the sacred message is still mocked while her life remains unchanged.
It's performative spectacle over a genuine heart change. One mocks repentance; the other mimics it. It's viral provocation for attention. The Blasphemy Challenge sought shock through unbelief; these "redemption arcs" seek shock (and monetization) through superficial belief. One profanes the Holy Spirit through denial; the other profanes baptism and grace by treating them as accessories to an unrepentant life. Both say, in effect: "I can redefine spiritual reality on my terms, curse God without fear, or claim God without transformation."
Scripture warns of this very spirit, an antichrist spirit that confesses Christ with lips while denying Him in deeds.
2 Timothy 3:5
"having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power"
The Blasphemy Challenge was overt rebellion against the Spirit’s conviction. In many ways, today's trend is more subtle, and far more dangerous. Using baptism not as death to sin but as a prop, teaching watchers that grace requires no repentance, no fruit, no "sin no more", and promotes spiritual ignorance.
Both leave the participants and observers "all wet" in the worst way: soaked in their self-deception, far from the living water of true regeneration.
And Now The Good News:
God’s mercy endures. Many who took the Blasphemy Challenge later repented quietly when conviction broke through. We pray the same for those riding this wave of performative conversions, that the Holy Spirit would pierce the performance, bring genuine metanoia, and produce fruit that lasts all the way into eternity.
The spirit of the age always seeks to redefine God on human terms. But the true gospel stands unchanging:
"Repent and believe" (Mark 1:15)
Not for likes, not for views, but for eternity.
May the Lord guard His church from both open blasphemy and its counterfeit twin. In the Holy name of Jesus, Amen!