The Holy Spirit Doesn’t Need a Hype Man
1 Corinthians 14:32-33
"and the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets. For God is not a God of confusion but of peace."
Prophetic messages claiming to come from the Holy Spirit are not uncontrollable or ecstatic in a way that overrides our understanding. A prophet that is true can wait their turn, remain silent if needed, and submit to the order of the gathering. This contrasts with some pagan practices of the time where oracles or mediums were thought to be "possessed" and lost all self-control when the spirit came upon them. There should be decency and order in worship, and no one can legitimately say they were "over-taken" and couldn’t restrain themselves. If someone claims "The Spirit made me do it, I couldn’t help interrupting or acting chaotically," that’s not a valid excuse for frenzied or uncontrollable behavior.
In the church gathering, speaking in tongues must be interpreted, otherwise the speaker should remain silent in the meeting and speak to himself and to God. Tongues without interpretation only edifies the speaker; with interpretation it edifies the whole church. And yet there are those who will present with tongues and follow with interpretation which is intended to be received as prophetic teaching.
And so Paul is running up against some in the Corinth church who were treating speaking in tongues and prophecy as if the Holy Spirit "hijacked" them, forcing them to blurt out messages, interruptively or dramatically. So when someone stands up in a meeting today and gives a tongue + interpretation that sounds suspiciously like a mini-sermon, a correction to the pastor, or a dramatic "Thus saith the Lord" that everyone is expected to obey, two big questions immediately arise in light of 1 Corinthians 14:
1. Is this actually from the Holy Spirit?
If it’s tongues, was there a genuine interpretation, or did the same person just switch to English and start preaching? Or is there a consistent and common interpretation from a nearby companion, one particular person (or a small clique) almost always interpreting every tongue in the meeting?
Fact of that matter is, when interpretation is monopolized by one or two people, it opens the door to manipulation. Paul says interpreted tongues should edify the church the same way prophecy does (14:5). And in practice, a genuine interpretation is usually roughly the same length and content density as the tongue itself. Wildly disproportionate length is a modern red flag almost never seen in Scripture.
2. Is this "interpretation" functioning as authoritative prophetic teaching?
Many charismatic churches today treat a tongue + interpretation exactly like a prophecy. Paul addresses this issue by noting "tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers, while prophecy is a sign not for unbelievers but for believers" (v. 22). Corporate discernment is required, "let the others weigh carefully what is said" (14:29).
In practice, this means:
Every tongue + interpretation is to be weighed, tested, and, if necessary, rejected by mature believers present. If the "interpretation" is 10 times longer than the tongue (a sermonette), or sounds exactly like the speaker’s normal preaching style, or contains rebuke that the New Testament would require two or three witnesses for, red flags should go up.
Bottom line:
"Let all things be done decently and in order" (v.40).
There needs to be order, which to me means, restraint, caution:
1. Never allow the same person to give both the tongue and the interpretation.
2. If someone starts speaking out in tongues without an interpretation, stop.
3. Treat every public tongue + interpretation (and every prophecy) as "weighty", but not canonical.
4. Forbid "tag-team" tongues, so that the body learns that this is not performance.
5. Teach the congregation that disproportionate length is a red flag.
6. Remind everyone, constantly, of 14:32–33; no one ever gets to say 'I couldn’t help it; the Spirit made me shout that out.' If you couldn’t control it, it wasn’t the Holy Spirit.
On another note: Some Christian communities will have "special services" in which these things trend. This is very telling. When tongues, interpretations, and "prophecies" are rare or nonexistent in the regular Lord’s Day gathering (the main Sunday service where the whole church gathers to hear the Word preached, take communion, and worship together along with potential unbelievers), but then suddenly explode in a midweek "special revival service," a "prophetic conference," or a "Holy Spirit night," it almost always indicates that even the leaders of the church know these practices don’t pass the 1 Corinthians 14 test under normal conditions.
In some congregations, in the "special meeting" setting, the crowd is self-selected (only the eager charismatics show up), the schedule is loose, the pastor isn’t preaching (so no one’s theology is being directly tested), and the atmosphere is emotionally charged.
Suddenly everyone is "free" to let go and let the practiced routines come out.
When the gifts are largely absent from the main gathering and only "come alive" in the special prophetic/revival nights, it’s a strong indicator that the practices rely more on atmosphere, expectation, and lack of oversight than on the actual leading of the Holy Spirit. And all too often beneath the surface of these things is an organized effort to produce these performances. Some have instructed students and visitors step-by-step techniques for providing prophetic tongues: "Begin speaking out syllables by faith…step out with a prophetic word even if you only have one sentence…practice giving interpretations in small groups."
These people believe things like, prophecy is a skill you can learn, and you can teach people how to cooperate with the Holy Spirit impressions. They're taught to "prime the pump" with music, repetition, and physical techniques. They believe there is a "learning curve" in prophecy and that young people need to "practice" giving words.
All this is ironic because, when entire movements build training programs around "how to" do what the New Testament says the Spirit does as He wills, they have effectively moved from biblical Spirituality into something much closer to the very pagan ecstatic techniques Paul was correcting in Corinth. Yet this has been standard operating procedure in large sections of the revival/Holy-Spirit-emphasis stream for more than a hundred years. And that is one of the biggest reasons many discerning Spiritualists today keep a very careful distance from those circles.
In summary; in 1 Corinthians 14, Paul gently but firmly pops the balloon of spiritual drama queens: "Real prophets can pump the brakes; the Holy Spirit doesn’t hijack the steering wheel and drive you into chaos." If someone has to shout over the pastor, flop around, or deliver a ten-minute "interpretation" after a three-second tongue, Paul’s diagnosis is simple: that’s not God; that’s just excitement looking for a religious excuse.
And when you discover there are actual classes, coaching sessions, and "activation exercises" teaching people how to manufacture tongues and prophecy on cue (complete with starter syllables and applause for effort), the irony is thick. The very chapter written to stop Corinth from imitating pagan frenzy has been turned into a 120-year long curriculum for doing exactly that, just with better lighting and a bookstore in the lobby.
Bottom line, delivered with a smile: If the Holy Spirit needs mood lighting, a hype team, and a syllabus to show up, He’s probably not the one running the meeting.
Closing Prayer:
Father, thank You for giving Your Spirit without measure to Your Son and without regret to Your church. Forgive us for ever turning the gentle Dove into a circus act or a tool for control. Teach us again that Your voice is powerful enough without volume, Your presence real enough without stage lights, and Your gifts mature enough to wait their turn.
May our meetings look less like pagan frenzies and more like the gathered family of the Prince of Peace. In the name of Jesus, who never once had to shout to be heard, Amen.