Allah..."The best of planners" or "deceiver"?
Let me begin with an honest assessment of my personal understanding about the nature of God, rooted in the belief that only the Triune God of Christianity is the true God.
Titus 1:1-2
"Paul, a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ, for the sake of the faith of God's elect and their knowledge of the truth, which accords with godliness, in hope of eternal life, which God, who never lies, promised before the ages began."
Some Christian apologists argue that the Quran’s description of Allah’s "makr" (strategic planning or outmaneuvering) in verses like Quran 3:54 reveals a deceptive nature incompatible with the Biblical God, who "cannot lie". And this should be clear to the thoughtful Christian apologist, that this parallels with Satan’s titles in the Bible, like "father of lies" (John 8:44) or the deceiver in Revelation 12:9. Additionally, Allah shares traits with Satan, such as being a "moon god", and encouraging violence.
The debate about the claim that Allah is in fact Satan often hinges on one’s initial agenda (starting assumptions):
If you start from a Christian view...
John 14:6 "No one comes to the Father except through me"
Then any non-Christian "deity" must be labeled as demonic in origins.
And conversely, if you start from an Islamic view, Allah is thought to be the same God as in the Bible (Quran 29:46), and such claims are blasphemous misunderstandings.
Is this all really just about cultural projection? After all, both texts describe a supreme being outwitting evil.
If one were to stop there, one might concede that it is in fact projection. But when taken seriously together with a thoughtful approach that reflects on all that we know about "The Prophet" of Islam, it then becomes much clearer to the discerning Christian, who's deceiving who.
Basically, it all boils down to whether the Quran’s description of Allah as "khayru l-mākirīn" in 3:54 (often translated as "the best of planners" by Muslims but "the best of deceivers" by Christian critics) indicates deception, and if that aligns with a Christian view of God vs. Satan.
Let me begin with Islamic teaching regarding the gospel of Jesus Christ. In context, the Quran describes Allah as countering the plots of those trying to kill Jesus; foiling their schemes by making it appear as if Jesus was crucified (per Quran 4:157) while actually saving him. So you see, right off the bat, Islam claims Jesus wasn't in fact crucified. And therefore he couldn't have been buried and raised from the dead. This immediately refutes all Christian gospel claims.
1 Corinthians 15:13-15
"...if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised."
Many, myself included, have no choice but to conclude that this makes Allah's prophet akin to Satan, the "father of lies" (John 8:44) or "deceiver of the whole world" (Revelation 12:9), especially since the Quran’s narrative "deceives" people about Jesus’ death, a key Christian event. Is this "clear" evidence of deception? It depends on the lens: If viewing through Christian exclusivism (John 14:6), differences in doctrine can seem demonic.
So it seems we should temper our view and try to be more careful about how we approach these linguistic differences.
But do we in fact need to stop there?
No.
As the Bible says about Christians, (you will know them by their love), we can learn much more about the nature of Allah and his prophet by their "love", or lack thereof.
"By their fruit you will recognize them" (Matthew 7:16–20) and "By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another" (John 13:35).
Jesus’ personal example:
Never killed, never ordered killing, never married (especially not a nine year old virgin), never led armies.
Taught "love your enemies," "turn the other cheek," "bless those who curse you."
Died forgiving his executioners (and don't forget, rose from death into everlasting glory).
Muhammad’s (Allah's "prophet" ) personal example:
Personally participated in or ordered dozens of military campaigns.
Ordered the execution of critics (Ka‘b ibn al-Ashraf, Asma bint Marwān in some reports), the assassination of his enemies, and the expulsion or subjugation of Jewish tribes in Medina.
Married at least eleven wives (some sources say thirteen), including nine-year-old ‘Ā’isha and Zaynab bint Jaḥsh (the wife of his adopted son, after the adoption was abrogated).
Allowed temporary marriage (mut‘a, later banned by Sunni Islam), concubine rights with captives, and slavery.
New Testament Imagery:
Almost no commands to violence; the few violent images are eschatological (Christ returning as judge).
Quran and Hadith Imagery:
Numerous verses and narrations about fighting unbelievers, striking terror into enemies (Quran 8:12), jizya (tax on infidels) with humiliation (9:29), and severe punishments in this life (crucifixion, amputation, stoning for adultery, death for apostasy in classical law).
Historical and present-day fruit:
Many Christians point to centuries of jihad conquests, the dhimmi system (restricted living arrangements for foreigners), modern Islamist terrorism, honor killings, and the treatment of religious minorities in many Muslim-majority countries as evidence that the Islamic "tree" consistently produces different fruit from that of the Christian gospel.
Because of these contrasts, many Christians, myself included, conclude that "the spirit" behind Islam cannot be the Holy Spirit, and the character of its founder is incompatible with the character of Christ. Therefore the ultimate source must be deceptive, Satanic in its essence.
So, for many thoughtful Christians like myself (especially those who have studied the primary sources), the cumulative weight of the radical difference in the founders’ lives, the tone of the respective scriptures, the historical trajectories (their fruit), and the doctrinal denial of the crucifixion and divinity of Christ, does make the conclusion feel very compelling.
Whatever the spirit was that spoke to "the prophet" in the cave at Hira, it was not the Spirit of Jesus.
For discerning Christians like myself, the contrasts in founders, their scriptures, and histories make the "Satanic deception" conclusion more than compelling. Especially in view of Muhammad’s own cave encounter (with initial fear and physical intensity).
Remember Folks:
2 Corinthians 11:14
"Satan masquerades as an angel of light".
Closing Prayer:
Heavenly Father,
You are the God of truth who cannot lie, the Light in whom there is no darkness at all.
Grant us discerning hearts and sound minds, that we may know the difference between the voice of the Good Shepherd and every stranger’s voice.
Give us wisdom to test the spirits, courage to love what is true, and grace to speak the truth in love.
Protect us from deception, lead us into all truth, and keep us faithful to Your Son, Jesus Christ, the Way, the Truth, and the Life.
In His holy name we pray.
Amen.