Embracing Biblical Creation: A Faithful Rejection of Macroevolution and Affirmation of Divine Design
Proverbs 20:12
"The hearing ear and the seeing eye, the Lord has made them both."
This verse informs us that God is the intentional Creator of human sensory organs, emphasizing divine design and purpose in their complexity rather than random processes. In a broader scriptural context, it underscores themes of God’s sovereignty in creation. God creates (ex nihilo) out of nothing, and within that creation he established human uniqueness as image-bearers (Genesis 1:26-27), implying that our senses like hearing and sight are not evolutionary accidents but crafted for perceiving truth, morality, and the world. Arguing against Darwinian evolution, highlighting the "irreducible complexity" of the eye and ear, systems far too intricate to arise simply by chance, as they require all parts functioning simultaneously. This supports the law of cause and effect: Such effects (advanced senses) demand an adequate cause (God), not unguided natural selection. Scripture therefore informs our Christian worldview where observation of design glorifies the Creator (Romans 1:20), and warns against idolizing nature (as in evolutionary naturalism), and affirms that our reliable senses are created for discerning our reality, since God designed them purposefully for us to know Him through His creation.
And that brings me to my perspective, the Genesis narative is history, not poetry, parable, prophetic vision, or mythology. And therefore my God is more than God enough to accomplish these great and miraculous things. I believe God created the first animate and inanimate things supernaturally and instantly. Fully formed and fully functioning. Plants, animals, and people, mature adults ready to reproduce naturally "after their kinds." When God said "let there be..." And so, I suppose this makes me a strict creationist to a certain degree.
What does it mean to be a "strict creationist to a certain degree"?
In general what that means to me is that as a Christian I reject macro-evolution—the idea of species changing into entirely new forms over time—as Charlie Kirk was known for saying, "at best [evolution is] a wild guess and at worst a lie from the pit of Hell."
This means I, and those like me, do not accept claims like humans evolving from apes, primates, bananas, primordial soup, or amoebas. We make our claim primarily on the evidence, or lack thereof. For instance, there’s no fossil evidence for actual species change, only adaptation (Darwin’s finches adjusting to their environments). While we can acknowledge observable adaptation (speciation) and openness to any new data, as it stands now, evolution is not proven fact and requires far more faith than creation.
And likewise the evolutionary theory is anathema to our Christian faith. Evolutionary theory prioritizes survival of the fittest, not survival of the truest, creating inconsistencies for those seeking objective truth, as it reduces humans to products of chance without a higher purpose. A central point in this case is the extreme improbability of evolution producing complex life through random processes. Biological intricacies like DNA sequencing, trillions of chromosomes, and the human body’s complex systems are evidence of intentional design, not chance. It's about the fine-tuning of existence which suggests a designer (God) which is a more rational argument than undirected evolution.
From a theological angle, for someone of faith such as myself, I have to question evolution’s compatibility with scripture: If humans evolved from primates, when did the first soul emerge or when was the first being made in God’s image? At what stage of evolutionary development does God create man in his own image. The implications are profound. Imagine the first image-bearer. A child, a human being image-bearing while its primate mother is not, the inconsistencies with scripture are profound. Evolution seems to me to personify nature as a false creator, which leads to moral relativism (survival of the fittest justifying evil), while creation affirms human uniqueness in God’s image.
Philosophically, this faith in the designed creation is tied to the universe’s beginning and asks the question, "If there’s a beginning, is there a beginner?", which naturally implys God's design over naturalistic origins like the Big Bang.
And so, in short this means I emphasize a literal interpretation of the Bible, particularly Genesis, as the foundation for understanding human (and all life) origins, while rejecting macroevolution and promoting intelligent design.
So, what do I believe?
Let's begin with the beginning, God created everything from nothing (ex nihilo), including light, the Earth, plants, animals, and humans in a specific sequence. The Earth and universe are approximately 6,000–10,000 years old, based on biblical genealogies, using our God created means for understanding time. I'm not 100% certain that no death, disease, or suffering existed in God's creation before Adam and Eve’s sin (we can get into potentialities). I feel that natural processes as we know them today could absolutely have been active even in Eden.
I believe Macro-evolution (species changing into new distinct kinds) is dismissed as unproven and contrary to scripture. And as a horticulturalist especially, I can fully understand the reality of adaptation, allowing for limited adaptation or "micro-evolution" (e.g., variations within kinds, like Darwin’s finches) but not the origin of new species. I also understand that there’s no fossil evidence for transitional forms which informs my view that evolution as a secular worldview is meant to undermine biblical authority.
From a purely scientific perspective, I view the complexity in nature (DNA, biological systems) and that points me to a designer (God) rather than random chance. Add to this the problem of probabilities and very important critiques about old-earth dating methods (radiometric dating) I see these things factoring into my thinking. This all began with me prior to my faithfulness to scripture. At a young age I saw the many flawed assumptions baked into the evolutionary theory and always questioned its validity. There is also much more evidence emerging that suggests a creationist view, for instance, high helium retention in granite zircons which suggests rapid radioactive decay (possibly accelerated during creation or the Flood), implying the earth is only thousands of years old, not billions. Also, detectable C-14 in coal, diamonds, and fossils (which should have decayed away after millions of years) supports a young timeline. And then there's Polonium radiohalos and excess Argon: These phenomena in rocks indicate flaws in potassium-argon dating, again challenging old-earth assumptions (Charlie Kirk's "wild guess" ). We are learning now with more and more scientific research that creatures are engineered (designed) with innate adaptive mechanisms. Likewise, soft tissues and proteins in fossil records indicate recent burial (post-Flood extinction).
In regard to Noah’s flood, was it certainly catastrophic for Noah’s and his contemporaries? Yes. And was it universal from Noah’s point of view? Yes. But did that event create the bulk of the features of Earth’s crust? Again I believe yes. A year-long global catastrophe explains fossils, canyons, and strata, with evidence from archaeology and science supporting its historicity.
Of course I believe Jesus Christ is God in the flesh. "In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God." (John 1:1). And that Jesus Christ is God’s solution for the corruption of sin (information) introduced in Genesis 3. "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." (John 3:16)
In summary:
My faith informs my world-view. As a "strict creationist to a certain degree," I prioritize a literal interpretation of the Bible (especially Genesis as historical narrative, not poetry or myth) while engaging scientific evidence critically. My faith in Jesus Christ, as the Creator, emphasizes God’s sovereignty as Creator, rejecting macroevolution as unproven, improbable, and incompatible with scripture, and affirming intelligent design. Jesus created everything ex nihilo (from nothing) supernaturally and instantly. Evolution conflicts with scripture, for example when does the soul or God’s image emerge in a primate lineage? And It idolizes nature as a false creator. And finally, Jesus Christ is God incarnate (John 1:1), the solution to sin’s corruption (John 3:16). The Biblical Creation is foundational to the gospel, affirming human uniqueness as image-bearers with inherent God-given purpose.
Prayer:
Heavenly Father, Creator of all things seen and unseen, we humbly ask that You open the ears of Your people to hear Your truth in Scripture and grant them eyes to see the wonders of Your intentional design in the world around us. May hearts be softened to receive Your Word, rejecting falsehoods and embracing the gospel of Jesus Christ. In Jesus' Holy name we pray, Amen.