What God Intended for Beauty, Pride Corrupted
Genesis 2:8-9 (AMP)
And the Lord God planted a garden (oasis) in the east, in Eden (delight, land of happiness); and He put the man whom He had formed (created) there. And [in that garden] the Lord God caused to grow from the ground every tree that is desirable and pleasing to the sight and good (suitable, pleasant) for food; the tree of life was also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the [experiential] knowledge (recognition) of [the difference between] good and evil.
As a person whose life has been centered around planting and cultivating trees, you might imagine that these verses are very interesting to me.
As I see it, God Himself is the first landscape gardener here. He plants an oasis of delight (Eden) and then causes every kind of tree to grow that is both beautiful to look at and good for food. So, it's not just about providing food or materials for clothing and such. This garden is aesthetically beautiful. Beauty and provision are not separate concerns for the Creator; they are designed together from the beginning.
The trees are described with a double quality that any designer would recognize and appreciate.
Eden was designed to be:
"desirable and pleasing to the sight"
and
"good for food"
Function, design, beauty and provision. Absolutely the kind of place I'd design were I the Creator.
God is not merely stocking a pantry; He is composing a place. He "planted a garden (oasis)" and then "caused to grow…every tree that is desirable and pleasing to the sight and good for food." The same trees carry both qualities. Beauty is not an optional overlay on provision; it is built into the plants themselves. This isn't simple utilitarianism, there is thought given to capturing the eye and the imagination.
Why do you suppose that is?
Why would the first people need to have a place to live that captures their imagination and pleases their appreciation for beauty?
I think the answer to that question gets at the heart of who God is. From my perspective, He is an architect and designer. In the text we see that God does not treat beauty as a luxury added after the essentials are covered. It presents it as part of the original composition of the place where God puts the man. And since mankind is made in God's image, it stands to reason that He would create in them the same essential appreciation for beauty and a desire for perfection.
So, I find it pleasing to know that God is a landscape designer. And that the garden’s beauty is not an afterthought because the Designer is not an afterthought-maker. He's baked beauty into everything He creates, even the Devil.
And so, if beauty is not an afterthought but is baked into the original composition of what God makes, then it is not limited to the garden’s trees. It appears even in what later falls.
The text of Genesis itself does not describe the serpent’s appearance, yet other passages speak of a being who was "perfect in beauty" and set in Eden before pride corrupted him (Ezekiel 28:12–17). The prophets words describe a pre-creation or mid-creation time when Lucifer was not yet fallen in pride and disobedience. He's among the primordial stars as the heavens are developing, and he's integral to the witnessing of the primordial earth.
"[He was] You were the seal of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God…You were the anointed cherub who covers…You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created, until unrighteousness was found in you" (Ezekiel 28:12–15).
Lucifer [The Dragon] was given extraordinary beauty and a place in Eden, and he later turns from that given station. The garden God plants in Genesis 2 is already the setting in which this angelic being is said to have been present while still blameless.
The landscape beauty is not introduced only for the man; it is part of the ordered place in which even the covering cherubs walked.
2/2
The fall of mankind does not rewrite the origin of the design; it shows a refusal to remain within it. But before the fall of man there is the fall of Satan and many of his fellow angelic beings.
The same Designer who causes every tree to be desirable to the sight and good for food also forms an angelic creature perfect in beauty and sets him in that garden. And when pride is found in him, the beauty remains a testimony to what was originally given, not to what he became.
So, while the sons of God and the morning stars were shouting for joy at creation (Job 38:7) pride was setting up shop.
Pride about what?
I hate to say it, but with beauty comes pride. God creates beauty and as a matter of course, pride comes along with it.
But there is a distinction. Beauty is given; pride is chosen. Ezekiel 28 is careful on the sequence.
The covering cherub (Lucifer) was "perfect in beauty" and "blameless in your ways from the day you were created, until unrighteousness was found in you." The beauty and the blamelessness stand together for a time. Unrighteousness is later "found in" him; it is not described as the automatic companion of the beauty he received.
So, where does pride find its origin?
Pride finds its origin in the free turning of a created will away from the Giver and toward the self.
Why was pride found in the Devil?
Because "your (his) heart was lifted up because of your (his) beauty; you (he) corrupted your (his) wisdom by reason of your (his) splendor."
It's in part a pronoun problem. A self-centered scenario. Satan saw his beauty, was full of pride for it, and was very unhappy to witness God create a new creature after His own image.
In Lucifer's heart the beauty is his; the lifting up is his; and whether he realizes it or not, the corruption of wisdom follows from treating that splendor as ground for self-exaltation rather than as gift.
Isaiah 14:13–14 fills out the content of the lifted heart with a string of "I will" statements that culminate in "I will make myself like the Most High." The origin of pride remains the free turning of the created will from the Giver toward the self. Pride is found in him because he found occasion in what he had received to center the design on himself.
As we would say, he made it all about himself. He was glazing himself. Ezekiel 28 and Isaiah 14 focus on the cherub’s rivalry with God ("I will ascend…I will be like the Most High" ).
But is that rivalry an impetus for hatred toward the man creature who literally is made in God's image?
I say absolutely. What follows surly makes that clear. His actions following the creation of man make his motivations clear. But all that rivalry aside, one thing is truly clear in the context of these origin accounts, pride originates in the creature’s decision to make the received beauty a platform for the self rather than a testimony to the Designer. And later he'll drive that rebellious thought home in the minds of Eve and then Adam.
At the end of the day, whether we're viewing Satan or the first people, the determination to make oneself like the Most High is the impetus for prideful behavior. And what follows is a pattern of sin that has played out now for millennia and continues even now. The one whose heart is lifted up because of his own splendor later uses the Creator's garden’s and His own tree to offer a counterfeit path to godlikeness. So, pride originates in the creature’s decision to treat received beauty as a platform for the self rather than as testimony to the Designer. That decision, once made, does not stay private. It moves from the cherub’s heart into the garden, where it offers the man and the woman the same turn from grace, from gift to seizure.
"I will be like the Most High."
The beauty of the trees and the garden design stays what it was; but the refusal to remain within that design is what spreads out into history. What God intended for beauty His creatures used for ugliness.
Amen 🙏🏼