So God Created Man In His Own Image
Genesis 1:24-25
Then God said, "Let the earth produce living creatures according to their kind: livestock and crawling things and animals of the earth according to their kind"; and it was so. God made the animals of the earth according to their kind, and the livestock according to their kind, and everything that crawls on the ground according to its kind; and God saw that it was good.
Elohim is grammatically plural, the plural form of Eloah. In Genesis 1:1 it is used as if it's a singular verb. It's speaking in the triune sense. Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. And so, the subject of the verb "said" is Elohim in all these creation accounts. The triune Godhead is the subject. The name is plural in form, yet throughout the chapter it consistently takes on singular verbs. That pattern begins in Genesis 1:1 ("In the beginning Elohim created" ) and continues here.
And so, we find here the puzzle that confounds so many. The grammar presents a single divine Actor who speaks and brings the living creatures into being. Yet the verbiage speaks in plural terms. When this Genesis account later reaches the creation of mankind, the same Elohim says, "Let Us make man in Our image" (1:26), then immediately returns to the singular, "God created man in His own image" (1:27). The plurality and the tri-unity are both present in the text.
This shouldn't be a puzzle. The Spirit is already active hovering, the creative Word is God saying things should be, and when God commands the earth to produce living creatures according to their kind, the command issues from the triune God. The livestock, the crawling things, and the animals of the earth come forth by the will and word of Father, Son, and Spirit together.
The earth is told to produce; the creatures appear according to their kinds; God makes them; and God sees that it is good. All throughout this creation week the subject isn't the creatures, it's the God who created them. This is not a contradiction that needs to be explained away.
But this sixth day is not complete.
Genesis 1:26-27
Then God said, "Let Us make mankind in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the livestock and over all the earth, and over every crawling thing that crawls on the earth." So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
Now the image-bearers appear. Now the emphasis shifts to these image-bearers. As God relates to mankind. As God provides for his needs. As God sets up the earth according to His perfect plan. All r he creatures were just declared good and are now placed under the rule of the one creature who bears the image of their Maker. And this dominion is very specific. Dominion over the fish, the birds, the livestock, and every crawling thing.
This is a huge day, this sixth day. And the work of the sixth day is only finished when the image-bearer stands in the midst of what God has made. This is why the subject shifts slightly. Now there is a linked relationship that has not been evident before. This relational shift is the key-note. God relates to mankind in a way He has not related to any other creature. He provides for their needs. He sets the earth in order according to His plan, and He places the creatures just declared good under the rule of the one creature who bears His image. is why the subject, while still Elohim, now speaks in the plural "Us" and "Our."
Throughout this creation account there has been our God creating distinctions. Now we see the cumulative distinction. The animals were all made according to their kind. Man is made distinctly, according to the likeness of the God who creates all things. This is more than significant. The same triune God who called the living creatures forth and saw that they were good now makes a creature who can know Him, name what He has made, and exercise rule under Him.
This God- like image is not a vague resemblance. It is the capacity for real relationship with the God who made him. The animals know the earth that produced them; man is made able to know the One who spoke the earth into being. It's the knowing that becomes the narrative from now on. Everything that follows; the placement in the garden, the command against knowing good and evil, the naming of the animals, the forming of the woman, the later fall. All this unfolds inside a relationship that did not exist for any other creature. Man alone is made able to hear, to answer, and to walk with God.
In the Hebrew language the word for this "knowing" is (yada). Yada is not limited to information or intellectual awareness. It covers personal experience, intimate relationship, recognition, and even covenant faithfulness.
In casual speech this word becomes a sort of verbal shrug when we say, yada-yada-yada to express "and so on and so forth". But in the biblical context yada does the opposite. It is the word for the knowledge that involves the knower. It's personal, experiential, relational. It informs where cultural refuses to take a stand. It is the knowing that refuses to stay at a safe distance, the knowing for which man was made. In a world where so many, Christian and other, this word challenges the ethos. Biblical exegesis, Christian tradition, humanist ideology, all struggle with the depth of this knowing word. All these people struggle with making a decision about what they know.
We live now in a world full of people; Christian and otherwise, who prefer to keep their distance. Yada presses the question of what we will actually do with what we know. It will not let the knower remain unchanged. We cannot know what God has done and said about it and then stammer on what a woman is, or the roles of men and women. The knowing that forms the image-bearer was never meant to leave us undecided about the very distinctions God Himself has established.
There should be absolutely no confusion. The distinctions are baked into the creation. There is no "non-binary" God. The Father is the Father. The Son is the Son. The man is the man and the woman is the woman.
The image of God is what makes that all that knowing possible and absolutely necessary. It is not merely that man can think about God; he is made to stand in personal relation to Him, to represent Him on the earth, and to rule under His authority. Our cultural customs cannot push into that relationship a redefined purpose not given. Mankind was not given that authority, and pretty much everything that follows the seventh day of creation is dealing with mankind's attempts at redefining his relationship with his Creator.
It's interesting to note that in this Genesis account, the very first time God says something is not good, He's talking about mankind being alone. And so, He makes woman from the man. Not another person made from dust, but uniquely formed from out of the man. Distinct again. Distinct from every other created thing. And created to help the man. Good created to deal with the not good. Very interesting. Worth pondering.
Later God will highlight something else that is not good in this Creator/creature relationship. He'll highlight man's refusal to let the image-bearer remain unchanged by what he knows about his Creator.
The moral of this story is all this yada, this knowing that forms the image-bearer, was never meant to leave us undecided about the very distinctions God Himself established. The truth is in the distinctions. And the confusion comes when mankind attempts to view everything from an equality perspective.
The trouble we will see in the following chapters, and pretty much every other Bible book, is caused by this perspective question.
Amen 🙏🏼