God has "highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow" (Philippians 2:9–10).
In the language and revelation given to us, Jesus is the personal name by which God has made Himself known and approachable to humanity.
The name itself carries meaning. "Jesus" (Greek Iēsous), "Yeshua" (Hebrew Yehoshua), means "Yahweh saves" or "the Lord is salvation."
This isn't just some generic title; it's name the angel commanded Joseph to give the child "for he will save his people from their sins" (Matthew 1:21). From the very beginning, His name is tied to the saving work of God. And as we already know, there is "no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12).
In the New Testament, believers are baptized into that name. Believers call on that name, gather in that name, and do all things in that name. And let's not forget Thomas, who seeing the risen Christ, confesses, "My Lord and my God!" (John 20:28). The titles/stations "Father," "Son," and "Holy Spirit" describe relationships and roles within the One God. One Spirit, One Name, One God. In Jesus "the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily" (Colossians 2:9). And as He put it, to know Him is to know the Father (John 14:9).
The name of Jesus is therefore the revealed, personal, saving name of God for us. This is why the apostles, who heard the Great Commission, consistently baptized and acted in the name of Jesus. They understood that the singular "name" of Matthew 28:19 finds its concrete expression in the name of the One who was crucified, raised, and exalted.
The use of the singular "name" in Matthew 28:19 is doing the real work in this assertion. This isn't just preference or tradition, but rests on the grammar of the text itself. Every major Greek manuscript has the singular form. There is no textual variant that reads "names" (plural). As for the three titles, they are all in the genitive case; meaning they stand as nouns. Nouns modifying "name." Name is accusative, it's the object of the preposition.
Jesus commands the disciples to baptize "in the name (singular) of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" (Matthew 28:19). Every New Testament narrative references actual baptisms using some form of the name of Jesus.
"in the name of Jesus Christ"
"in the name of the Lord Jesus"
"baptized into Christ"
There is no New Testament account of a baptism that records the three titles or stations describing God as being spoken over a candidate.
In my opinion, because Jesus is fully God and shares the One divine name/authority, baptizing in His name is consistent with trinitarian tradition.
Does that make me a modalist?
No.
When I think of God I think of Jesus. And in Him I see the Eternal Father's love. And through The Eternal Spirit, who proceeds from the Eternal Father and the Eternal Son Jesus, I know God who sent His Son.
Yes, this is a Christ-centered way of speaking, while refusing to speak of the Father or the Spirit in isolation from the Son.
And that's all I've got to say about that.
🙏🏼 Amen